Our favourite
non-artist Banksy (i.e. his real identity is unknown) has been busy again with
his satirical art, this time painting in his distinctive stencil style a Les
Mis themed image on a wall near the French Embassy in London criticising the
use of teargas in the ‘Jungle’ refugee camp in Calais. Whilst widely
reported (see this article in the Guardian and this one in the Metro) the story and images in the Daily Mail report interested me most as a conservator.
Banksy’s
images are always vulnerable to being graffitied, overpainted or destroyed as
they are invariably:
a) Protest art
b) Painted on unprepared and often
temporary surfaces
Sometimes that
destruction is inadvertent - As described in this Sydney Morning Herald article, Melbourne’s city street cleaners did a fine job painting over one,
and this in a city renowned for its street art!
More often it
is an active process by the authorities being satirised to remove it. In the
London instance the artwork came with a QR code which linked to a tear gas
attack in the Calais refugee camp on 5th January, one which
presumably the French Government were not over-keen to have publicised, hence
their quiet word to their British counterparts to cover it up ASAP.
The irony is that the British authorities claimed they were rushing to cover it up to preserve it, the same argument the French authorities had taken with murals Banksy had painted in the refugee camp itself. Which is where the Daily Mail images are interesting, because it is clear both from the article and the images that the first way they attempted to preserve it was by ripping it to shreds with a crowbar, not a method which comes readily to mind in my toolkit of preservation processes.
The irony is that the British authorities claimed they were rushing to cover it up to preserve it, the same argument the French authorities had taken with murals Banksy had painted in the refugee camp itself. Which is where the Daily Mail images are interesting, because it is clear both from the article and the images that the first way they attempted to preserve it was by ripping it to shreds with a crowbar, not a method which comes readily to mind in my toolkit of preservation processes.
The next
question then is from a conservation point of view - what part of the artwork
should be conserved? To my mind the crowbar damage is now part of its story,
namely how the artwork was responded to, but the view could be put that this is
damage that needs repairing.
Luckily I can
report that this and other Protest Art issues will be the subject of a major
dialogue at the forthcoming IIC Congress in LA in September 2016 entitled
“Umbrellas, Gas Masks, and Post-it-Notes: Considering the historic and
conservation challenges of objects created for social protest”. The dialogue
will be in the form of a discussion between those who create the art and their
intent for it, and those who promote it, collect it and protect it. As the
blurb for the dialogue states:
“Historic
events of the past years have highlighted art as a creative means of social
expression to current events as well as an impactful tool used during social
protests. Whether to express solidarity, such as Je Suis Charlie, or to
promote political freedom for the activists in Hong Kong, disobedient art has
found its presence in the world of artistic expression. The impact of
disobedient art on cultural perspectives has been tremendous and the historical
significance of using art to inspire and promote these events is gaining in
popularity.”
There will be
lots to discuss. Make it to LA if you can.